Discover how martial combat evolved between World War I and World War II, as trench warfare, military hand-to-hand systems, and the rise of combat sports reshaped the global fighting landscape.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Between the World Wars, military tactics, political ideologies, and cultural exchange reshaped martial arts. Trench warfare demanded brutal close-quarters combat, while WWII’s covert operations led to the development of specialised hand-to-hand systems. During this period, combat sports flourished, reinforcing national identity and encouraging cross-training between Allied and Axis forces.
From trench knives to Krav Maga, and from Soviet Sambo to Judo’s military adaptation, this era laid the groundwork for modern military combatives. Military occupations also facilitated cultural exchanges, spreading Japanese martial arts to occupied territories. These innovations shaped both battlefield techniques and the post-war martial arts boom, influencing how combat disciplines evolved in the modern world.
🪖 WWI - Trench Warfare & Close-Quarters Combat
The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914 set the world ablaze, plunging nations into the first truly global conflict. For the first time in history, industrialised warfare met mass mobilisation, dragging millions into the mud-soaked horror of the trenches. Amid the thunder of artillery and the rattle of machine guns, brutal hand-to-hand combat reclaimed its grim place on the battlefield. In suffocating trenches and moonlit raids, bayonets, knives, and trench clubs dictated survival—forcing armies to relearn the savage realities of close-quarters fighting and forever reshaping the future of military combat.
Click on the links below to read more.
🌍 The Trenches of the Great War
The trenches of the Great War, stretching from the North Sea to the Swiss border, carved a scar across Europe, pitting the British, French, and later American forces against the Central Powers led by Germany and Austria-Hungary. Conditions were nightmarish: mud-choked passages, waterlogged craters, and a no-man’s-land strewn with barbed wire and shell holes. Troops endured constant bombardment, disease, and the psychological toll of perpetual danger. In these claustrophobic kill-zones, mass assaults collided with dug-in defences, forcing a brutal return to close-quarters combat where the bayonet, trench knife, and bare hands often decided life or death.
🔪 Bayonet & Knife Fighting
The horrors of World War I trench combat made bayonets and knives essential for close-quarters engagements. Bayonet fencing manuals from the Victorian era influenced the techniques used, focusing on thrusts, slashes, and angled attacks to maximise effectiveness in tight, muddy battlefields. Trench raiding manuals detailed stabbing and slashing techniques, refining grips, footwork, and leverage for use in narrow passages and nighttime raids. These raids, blending stealth, aggression, and improvised weaponry, laid early tactical foundations for the specialised commando operations of the Second World War.
Training drills emphasised rapid thrusts and decisive strikes, ensuring soldiers could react quickly in confined spaces. The widespread use of trench knives, knuckle dusters, and improvised weapons—including trench clubs and shotguns—added to the brutality of these encounters. Despite the dominance of firearms, bayonet charges remained a key tactic to maintain offensive momentum, cementing the bayonet’s role in military doctrine.
Beyond tactics, trench warfare also forged a brutal combat psychology, conditioning soldiers to act without hesitation in lethal close-quarters encounters—a mindset that became central to later commando and special forces training. These brutal adaptations of trench combat set the tone for WWII urban fighting and commando raids, where the close-quarters mindset proved vital.
📘 Hand-to-Hand Combat Manuals & Early Military Combatives
William Fairbairn and Eric Sykes, veterans of Shanghai’s underworld, developed ruthless, no-frills combat systems prioritising speed, aggression, and simplicity. The Defendu system, created by Fairbairn, integrated boxing, jiu-jitsu, and dirty fighting techniques—including throat strikes, eye gouges, and knife attacks—to neutralise threats instantly. Influenced by Bartitsu’s jiu-jitsu and cane fighting, Defendu adapted throws and joint locks for practical street and military use.
The design of the Sykes-Fairbairn fighting knife, with its balanced point, narrow blade, and textured grip, catered to silent kills in close-quarters combat and became a staple for British Commandos and Allied Special Forces. Cross-training between Allied forces and French Resistance fighters further refined covert knife fighting techniques, enhancing the effectiveness of these methods.
The ruthless efficiency of systems like Defendu would soon cross the Atlantic, shaping the hand-to-hand curriculum of elite units like the US Marine Corps and the OSS, embedding close-quarters brutality into Allied military doctrine. The influence of these wartime combat systems extended beyond the battlefield, shaping post-war law enforcement and special forces hand-to-hand training globally.

Hand-to-hand combat in the trenches of World War I was brutal and primitive, fought with bayonets, trench clubs, knives, and bare hands in suffocating, mud-choked corridors. In the chaos of night raids and close-quarters assaults, survival depended on speed, ruthlessness, and the will to kill at arm’s length in some of the most horrific conditions in military history.
Combat During the Interwar Period (1918–1939)
In the uneasy calm after World War I, combat sports surged from survival skill to global spectacle. In America, boxing became a national obsession and wrestling transformed into crowd-pleasing entertainment. Meanwhile, Japan pushed its martial arts onto the world stage, blending tradition with modern identity. Across gyms, arenas, and cultural exchanges, the interwar years forged a new era—where combat left the trenches and captured the world’s imagination.
🇺🇸 USA
Click on the links below to read more.
🥊 Boxing’s Professional Boom
Following World War I, boxing title fights became major sporting events, drawing massive audiences through radio broadcasts and newspaper coverage. Figures like Jack Dempsey symbolised the sport’s explosive growth, with his bouts setting attendance and revenue records at venues like Madison Square Garden. The founding of the National Boxing Association (NBA) in 1921 helped standardise title fights and introduce weight classes, making the sport more accessible and regulated.
The influence of newspapers and sports journalists elevated champions to national hero status, capturing the public imagination with detailed fight reports and ringside commentary. The rise of training camps and early sports science also improved fighter preparation, setting new standards for conditioning and strategy. Meanwhile, the international spread of boxing to Latin America, Europe, and Asia showcased its global appeal, transforming it into a symbol of resilience and competition. The emergence of boxing commissions played a key role in reducing the sport’s reputation for brutality, ensuring its acceptance as a legitimate and respected discipline.
🧠 Boxing’s Technical Evolution and Grassroots Boom
Behind the roaring crowds and rising media spectacle, American boxing in the interwar period experienced a quiet revolution in training and technique. Legendary coaches like Jack Blackburn, trainer of heavyweight champion Joe Louis, pioneered new methods focusing on precision pad work, defensive movement, and conditioning drills that elevated fighters beyond sheer toughness. Early explorations of sports science improved preparation, sharpening footwork, stamina, and strategy to professional standards that would echo globally.
At the same time, grassroots initiatives like the launch of the Golden Gloves tournament in 1927 transformed boxing from a spectacle into a working-class institution. Community gyms and local tournaments expanded the talent pool, while police and military academies adopted boxing for character development and combat readiness.
Together, these developments not only refined the technical craft of boxing but also embedded it deeply into American culture—ensuring its influence would reach far beyond the ring, into military training halls and across international borders.
🤼♂️⛏️🎪 Catch Wrestling - From Coalfields to Carnival Rings
Forged in the rough coal pits and factory towns of Lancashire, England, Catch-as-Catch-Can wrestling emerged as a no-nonsense grappling style, built for grit and survival. In mining communities where strength was survival, Catch developed in fairs and carnival rings, where tough men tested their skills in grueling, bare-knuckle contests. The style prioritised rapid pins and brutal joint locks, with masters of the craft—known as “hookers”—specialising in submission holds to finish matches with ruthless efficiency.
Techniques like the toe hold, neck crank, and cross-face showcased Catch’s aggressive, pragmatic approach: control the opponent, force submission, or pin them fast. But Catch was more than techniques—it was a mindset of relentless pressure, forged by harsh conditioning practices such as neck bridges, body hardening, and grinding endurance training, preparing wrestlers for punishing bouts under harsh lights and harsher crowds.
The style travelled well beyond Britain’s shores. Farmer Burns and Frank Gotch became legends in the United States, defeating champions from rival systems and demonstrating the power of Catch’s submission-heavy arsenal. Their success ignited international interest, helping Catch influence the rise of freestyle wrestling, submission grappling, and eventually, modern MMA. Today, the legacy of Catch-as-Catch-Can survives in the ground-fighting tactics of combat sports worldwide, proving that its raw, working-class origins produced one of history’s most enduring and adaptable grappling systems.
🤼♂️🎭💪 Pro Wrestling Emergence
As Catch wrestling evolved, many matches became “worked” (predetermined) to maximise entertainment value. Pioneers like Toots Mondt and Ed “Strangler” Lewis recognised the potential of blending legitimate grappling techniques with scripted drama to captivate audiences. This shift introduced heel vs. face (villain vs. hero) dynamics, transforming pro wrestling into a story-driven spectacle. The National Wrestling Alliance (NWA), founded in 1948, played a pivotal role in standardising rules and titles, ensuring a cohesive and expansive reach for the sport.
The influence of television broadcasts in the 1950s rapidly expanded wrestling’s audience, turning stars like Gorgeous George into household names. Wrestling territories across the US and the influence of British Catch-as-Catch-Can wrestling shaped the development of Japanese puroresu and Lucha Libre, each adding regional twists. The incorporation of submission holds, suplexes, and signature moves preserved the technical essence of Catch wrestling. As TV networks syndicated wrestling shows nationally, the sport’s transformation into story-driven entertainment led to its explosive popularity, setting the stage for modern promotions and televised events.
🤼♂️🥊🎥 The Birth of Combat Sports as Spectacle
The interwar years in the United States marked the beginning of combat sports as mass entertainment—a foundation that would shape global combat culture for generations to come. Fights held at iconic venues like Madison Square Garden, broadcast over radio, and reported in vivid detail by sports journalists, transformed boxers and wrestlers into national heroes. Spectatorship extended far beyond the arena, as fans followed fighters’ journeys through newspapers and emerging sports media, turning combat into a shared cultural experience.
The popularity of these events inspired countless young athletes to enter the gym and the ring, fuelling the next generation of fighters. Crucially, what began as an American spectacle caught fire across the world. International audiences were captivated by the drama and intensity of these contests, seeing in them both national pride and universal appeal.
As radio and later television expanded their reach, the visibility of combat sports skyrocketed, embedding boxing and wrestling into the fabric of global culture. This commercialisation and broadcast reach not only legitimised these arts in the public eye but also laid the groundwork for future developments in mixed martial arts, sports entertainment, and the worldwide phenomenon of combat sports today.

During the interwar years, boxing exploded across the United States and Britain, with figures like Jack Dempsey turning the sport into a symbol of Western toughness, resilience, and mass entertainment. (Dempsey vs Gibbons July 4, 1923).
🇯🇵 Japan
Click on the links below to read more.
🥋 Japanese Martial Arts
Japanese martial arts underwent significant development and global dissemination during the interwar years. Diplomatic missions and Japanese embassies actively promoted martial arts demonstrations abroad, showcasing Judo’s structured techniques and Karate’s striking methods to Western audiences. These events, supported by cultural diplomacy initiatives, helped position Japan as both a military and cultural power.
🎖️🥋🏛️ The Rise of Karate as National Discipline
Karate, originally an Okinawan fighting art, was introduced to mainland Japan and formalised by Gichin Funakoshi as Shotokan Karate, emphasising linear strikes, powerful kata (forms), and a disciplined approach suitable for both civilian and military training. Its integration into school curriculums and military programs cemented its role in shaping Japan’s martial identity.
🌀 Tomiki’s Vision: Bridging Tradition and Practicality
Meanwhile, innovators like Kenji Tomiki, a direct student of both Jigoro Kano (Judo) and Morihei Ueshiba (Aikido), worked to bridge tradition with practicality. Drawing from Daito-Ryu Aiki-Jujutsu, Tomiki introduced randori (free sparring) to Aikido, making it more dynamic and applicable for real combat scenarios. His emphasis on joint locks, redirection techniques, and throws aimed to balance sport practicality with traditional self-defence.
🌍 Laying Foundations for Global Spread
Tomiki’s early demonstrations in the United States and Europe laid the groundwork for Aikido’s post-war spread, highlighting its suitability for law enforcement and military training. His innovations also influenced broader martial trends, encouraging other instructors to adapt traditional Japanese arts for modern, competitive formats. While Aikido’s global rise would accelerate after World War II, Tomiki’s contributions during this period were crucial in shaping its future evolution.
🗡️ The Enduring Traditions of Japanese Martial Arts
While Judo, Karate, and the emerging Aikido were expanding their reach and modernising their methods, Japan’s traditional martial arts continued to thrive during the interwar period. Kendo, with its disciplined practice of swordsmanship, remained a pillar of martial education, especially within police and military circles. Sumo retained its place as Japan’s national sport, preserving ritual combat and grappling mastery amidst an age of modernisation.
Classical Jujutsu, though eclipsed in visibility by Judo, persisted in specialised dojos and among traditionalists, keeping alive ancient techniques of joint locks, throws, and submissions. These arts, deeply embedded in Japanese culture, provided a living link to the past, ensuring that as new systems evolved, the legacy of Japan’s martial heritage remained intact.

Karate arrived in mainland Japan from Okinawa in the early 20th century, where it was formalised into a disciplined striking art and quickly adopted by universities and the military.
The Road to War - Martial Arts in National Identity & Military Culture 🌍 🔥💣🪖
As tensions mounted in the years before World War II, nations across the globe turned their populations into armies in waiting. Schools, sports clubs, and youth movements became training grounds, embedding combat readiness deep into daily life. From Japan’s militarised Budo to Germany’s Turnvereins and the Soviet Union’s GTO programme, physical culture was weaponised as a tool of statecraft. In this global race to harden bodies and minds, martial arts and combat sports became more than pastimes—they were blueprints for survival in the total war to come.
Click on the links below to read more.
🏋️ Pre-War Physical Culture & Martial Readiness
As the world edged closer to global conflict, major powers began to harden not just their armies, but their entire populations for the trials of war. While strategies and battle plans were drawn in war rooms, a quieter campaign was unfolding in schools, youth organisations, and public arenas — the deliberate forging of a martial mindset. Governments and military planners recognised that victory in modern warfare demanded more than strategy and equipment; it required a physically conditioned, mentally resilient, and ideologically committed population.
From the Soviet Union’s GTO programme to Japan’s militarised Budo, and Germany’s Turnvereins to the rugged sports cultures of the US and UK, nations actively cultivated combat readiness long before the first shots were fired. Through state-driven training and deeply rooted cultural values, these systems prepared millions of young men — and increasingly women — for the brutal demands of total war. These were no accidents of culture, but strategic preparations for the gathering storm.
🇩🇪 Germany: Turnvereins & Physical Culture
Friedrich Ludwig Jahn founded the Turnvereins in the early 19th century to promote national fitness and combat readiness through gymnastics, wrestling, and strength training. By the interwar years, these clubs became centres of strength-building, incorporating Greco-Roman wrestling and boxing to prepare young men for military service. Under Nazi rule, sports like boxing, wrestling, and weightlifting were heavily promoted to cultivate a physically dominant population. The publication of military manuals like H.Dv. 130/2 codified these practices, aligning combat training with ideological ambitions. Public demonstrations and military sports competitions served as propaganda tools to rally national support, reinforcing the image of a martial and unified Germany.
🇯🇵 Japan: Nationalism & Military Budo
The Japanese government embraced martial arts as symbols of national identity, integrating Judo, Kendo, and Iaido into schools and military academies like the Toyama Military Academy. Jigoro Kano’s influence ensured that Judo emphasised both combat efficiency and moral development, reinforcing the Bushido ethos. The integration of Shinto and State Shinto ideology further aligned these arts with imperial ambitions, portraying them as paths to spiritual and national purity. By WWII, martial arts were compulsory in military training, ensuring soldiers embodied the Bushido spirit. The use of military manuals and Gekken (early Kendo) standardised these practices across the armed forces, serving both as combat training and propaganda tools to sustain military morale.
🇬🇧 United Kingdom: Athleticism, Empire, and Combative Sports
In the UK, martial preparation was less state-mandated and more cultural, rooted in the British love of competitive sports and the rugged virtues of empire. Boxing, fencing, rugby, and military athletics were deeply embedded in public school education, viewed as vital for building character, discipline, and leadership. The Officer Training Corps (OTC), established in universities and secondary schools, prepared young men for military leadership through drills, marksmanship, and physical conditioning. Meanwhile, the British Army and Royal Navy maintained regimental boxing championships and bayonet fencing tournaments, nurturing a culture of toughness and aggression. Manuals such as Infantry Training Vol. II (1937) codified hand-to-hand techniques and bayonet drills, preparing troops for close-quarters combat. Though less centralised than in Germany or Japan, Britain’s sporting and military traditions fostered a battle-hardened mentality that would steel its soldiers for the brutal campaigns of the Second World War.
🇺🇸 United States: The Frontier Spirit & Rise of Sporting Combat
In America, martial readiness was shaped by a rugged frontier heritage and the explosive popularity of combat sports in the early 20th century. Boxing boomed as both a professional spectacle and military training tool, with instructors integrating it into army camps during World War I. Wrestling, deeply rooted in collegiate sport and catch-as-catch-can styles, further contributed to soldier conditioning. While civilian programmes like the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and Works Progress Administration (WPA) were primarily economic recovery efforts, their focus on physical labour and conditioning quietly prepared a generation for military service. Military academies such as West Point emphasised athletics as foundational to leadership and endurance. As war loomed, pre-induction training schemes ramped up physical conditioning and combatives, inspired by the ethos of rugged individualism and the success of American athletes on the world stage. These factors helped forge a generation of fighters both in the ring and on the battlefield.
🇷🇺 Soviet Union: The GTO Programme & Proletarian Strength
In America, martial readiness was shaped by a rugged frontier heritage and the explosive popularity of combat sports in the early 20th century. Boxing boomed as both a professional spectacle and military training tool, with instructors integrating it into army camps during World War I. Wrestling, deeply rooted in collegiate sport and catch-as-catch-can styles, further contributed to soldier conditioning. While civilian programmes like the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and Works Progress Administration (WPA) were primarily economic recovery efforts, their focus on physical labour and conditioning quietly prepared a generation for military service. Military academies such as West Point emphasised athletics as foundational to leadership and endurance. As war loomed, pre-induction training schemes ramped up physical conditioning and combatives, inspired by the ethos of rugged individualism and the success of American athletes on the world stage. These factors helped forge a generation of fighters both in the ring and on the battlefield.

Turnvereins—German gymnastic clubs—played a major role in preparing youth for military service, blending physical fitness, discipline, and nationalism. By the early 20th century, they had become key institutions for building the strength and unity needed for Germany’s growing militaristic ambitions.
Together, these programmes reveal a clear truth: the major powers of the era did not merely prepare their armies for war—they prepared their entire societies.
WWII – Evolution of Military Combatives 🪖
As Japan emerged from centuries of civil war, its martial arts faced a crossroads. The battlefield faded, but the warrior spirit endured, demanding new paths for survival and discipline. Swordsmanship, grappling, and strategy were not discarded—they were reshaped for a changing world. In the dojos of a modernising nation, arts like Judo, Kendo, and Sumo refined old combat lessons into structured systems of precision and control. Through sport, education, and military training, Japan’s fighting traditions remained alive, carrying the legacy of the samurai into the modern era while preparing warriors for battles of mind, body, and spirit.
Introduction
As Japan turned inward and the world edged closer to war, martial arts entered a new, harsher phase of evolution. The coming conflicts would strip combat down to brutal essentials, forcing militaries worldwide to forge practical, efficient systems for survival. From the muddy trenches of Europe to the jungles of Asia, hand-to-hand combat would evolve under the crucible of total war, blending traditional techniques with battlefield necessity. The stage was set for the rise of military combatives—a grim but vital chapter in the story of martial arts.
🇯🇵⚔️ Empire of the Sun - Japanese Military Hand-to-Hand Combat
Click on the links below to read more.
🥋🪖 From Dojo to Battlefield
As Japan accelerated its military expansion in the 1930s, martial arts were no longer just cultural practices but were integrated aggressively into military doctrine. Judo, Jujutsu, and Kendo-derived bayonet fencing became essential components of infantry training, with manuals standardising movements for battlefield conditions. Training focused on aggressive forward movement, relentless bayonet thrusts, and decisive unarmed attacks, reflecting the nation’s martial philosophy of overwhelming spirit (Seishin) and sacrifice. Troops were taught to close the gap under enemy fire, using throws, locks, and strikes to finish opponents swiftly in jungle warfare, trench battles, and urban combat zones.
🧠🔥⚔️ The Cult of Seishin and the Path to Sacrifice
At the heart of Japan’s wartime martial ethos was the doctrine of Seishin—a relentless cultivation of spirit, mental fortitude, and absolute devotion to the Emperor, revered as a divine descendant of the gods. This spiritual resolve was instilled from the first day of military training, where soldiers were taught that victory could be seized not merely through technique, but through an unbreakable will to fight beyond physical limits. Such indoctrination laid the foundation for Japan’s infamous last-stand tactics and culminated in the rise of the Kamikaze, where pilots willingly sacrificed their lives for the nation’s divine destiny. Together, the cult of Seishin, Banzai charges, and Kamikaze missions were orchestrated not as isolated acts of desperation, but as state-directed strategies to embed “death before dishonour” into every echelon of Japan’s war machine.
This unyielding combat doctrine contributed to the infamous ferocity of Pacific battles, where Japanese troops fought to the last man at Iwo Jima and Okinawa, often shocking Allied forces with their refusal to surrender.
🏕️ Field Training and Combat Ethos
Japanese soldiers were drilled with a brutal emphasis on mental conditioning, preparing them to fight to the death. Hand-to-hand combat was not reserved for emergencies — it was seen as an inevitable aspect of combat. Field manuals encouraged pre-emptive bayonet charges, utilising the energy of the attack to maintain momentum even when firearms became useless. In close quarters, soldiers employed knife techniques, grappling, and brutal striking, honed to be effective in muddy foxholes, ruined buildings, and dense jungle terrain. The famed Banzai charges reflected this doctrine of aggression, though battlefield realities often led to devastating losses against better-armed Allied forces.
🎖️ Special Forces and Elite Units
Elite units such as the Teishin Shudan paratroopers and Kaigun Tokubetsu Rikusentai (Naval Special Landing Forces) received intensified close-combat training. These soldiers drilled knife combat, silent killing techniques, and dynamic throws for infiltration missions and ambush scenarios. Their training adapted traditional arts for stealth attacks, rapid eliminations, and last-stand defences, particularly in island warfare where retreat was rarely an option. They also integrated environmental combat, using terrain to gain the upper hand in close quarters, mirroring jungle ambush strategies later seen in Vietnam.
As one of Asia’s earliest dedicated airborne assault units, the Teishin Shudan represented Japan’s ambition to pioneer special forces tactics in the region, combining aggressive close-combat with daring infiltration missions.
🔪 Adapting Traditional Arts for Total War
The demands of total war stripped traditional martial arts of ritual and ceremony. Formal kata (forms) were broken down into practical sequences aimed at immediate effectiveness. Training prioritised speed over formality, with instructors focusing on movements that could be learned and applied rapidly under battlefield stress. Soldiers were taught to use every available weapon—from bayonets and entrenching tools to improvised blunt objects—ensuring adaptability in the chaos of battle.
💥 Limitations Exposed in Modern Warfare
Despite the intensity of their training, Japanese close-combat methods revealed critical limitations against Allied forces. Blade-focused systems, effective in close range, struggled against mechanised firepower, artillery barrages, and the superior close-combat doctrines developed by Allied special forces. Nonetheless, Japan’s relentless commitment to martial ethos left a lasting impression, and their pre-war export of Judo and Karate had already sown seeds that would flourish globally in the post-war period.

Japanese special forces units like the Teishin Shudan paratroopers during WWII were trained extensively in close-quarters combat, combining Judo, traditional jujutsu, bayonet drills, and knife fighting. Their hand-to-hand training emphasised speed, lethal efficiency, and silent killing techniques, designed for sabotage, infiltration, and shock assaults behind enemy lines.
As Japan hardened its soldiers through spiritual conditioning and blade discipline, the Allies took a different approach—developing a ruthless, pragmatic brand of hand-to-hand combat tailored for infiltration, sabotage, and silent kills.
Allied Special Forces Combatives: OSS, SOE, and British Commandos 🥋🪖
Click on the links below to read more.
🥷⚔️ OSS: America’s Dirty Fighting Doctrine
During World War II, Allied special forces prioritised brutal, efficient hand-to-hand combat, developing close-combat doctrines that blended speed, aggression, and ruthless practicality. British and American operatives cross-trained extensively, creating a shared system rooted in the hard lessons of the interwar years and the Shanghai underworld. Techniques were refined for infiltration missions, sabotage raids, and silent eliminations behind enemy lines.
The OSS (Office of Strategic Services), America’s wartime intelligence agency, expanded on Fairbairn-Sykes methods, training operatives in lethal strikes, knife fighting, and improvised weapons such as garrottes and trench knives. Rex Applegate, a leading instructor, adapted these methods further and authored Kill or Get Killed—a combat manual that became a cornerstone for post-war military and police combatives worldwide. The infamous “Gutter Fighting” method, taught to OSS recruits, blended judo, boxing, and dirty fighting tactics, focusing on eye gouges, knee strikes, and edge-of-hand blows for swift, decisive kills in confined spaces.
🇬🇧🔥 British Commandos: Forged in Fire at Achnacarry
Meanwhile, the British Commandos received intensive training at the Commando Training School in Achnacarry, Scotland, where Fairbairn-Sykes methods formed the backbone of their silent killing, knife fighting, and hand-to-hand combat programmes. The development of the iconic Fairbairn-Sykes fighting knife, designed for balance, speed, and silent kills, embodied the brutal efficiency of these techniques. Commandos trained relentlessly in ambush tactics and close-quarters engagements, preparing for daring raids across Europe and North Africa.
🕵️♂️🗡️ SOE: Sabotage and Survival Behind Enemy Lines
The SOE (Special Operations Executive), Britain’s clandestine force tasked with supporting resistance movements, further diversified the close-combat curriculum. Drawing on Bartitsu’s cane fighting techniques, Japanese jiu-jitsu, and Fairbairn’s methods, SOE operatives were trained to improvise weapons or fight unarmed when necessary. Unlike the OSS, whose focus leaned towards urban assassination and espionage, the SOE placed greater emphasis on supporting guerrilla warfare, tailoring their training for the unpredictable realities of sabotage missions deep in enemy-held territory.
💥🪖 Combatives for Regular Forces: Rangers, Marines, and the Front-Line Infantryman
While elite units received advanced training, regular troops were not left behind. The US Marines and Army Rangers adopted streamlined versions of these close-combat methods, ensuring that every soldier possessed basic but effective hand-to-hand skills. Training included modified Judo throws, bayonet drills, and brutal unarmed techniques for entrenchments and close-quarters fights. Practicality was key: soldiers learned instinctive reactions—targeting the throat, eyes, and joints to survive sudden assaults.
In the British Army, standard infantry training emphasised bayonet fighting, clubbing techniques with rifle butts, and simple but effective unarmed methods based on Fairbairn’s teachings. These skills prepared troops for the grim realities of trench raids, house-to-house clearing, and close-quarters jungle combat in Burma and the Pacific.
🤝📚 Cross-Training and Post-War Legacy
This Allied fusion of systems created a hybrid combative doctrine that prepared operatives for the realities of covert warfare. Cross-training with French Resistance fighters sharpened their close-quarters effectiveness, ensuring techniques were battle-tested under fire. The brutal efficiency of these methods did not vanish after the war; instead, they filtered into post-war law enforcement and special forces training, shaping police combatives and special operations programmes across the Western world.

During WWII, figures like Rex Applegate and William Fairbairn revolutionised military hand-to-hand combat with manuals such as Kill or Be Killed and Get Tough!. These guides stripped fighting down to brutal essentials—eye gouges, throat strikes, and instinctive takedowns—designed for soldiers to neutralise threats quickly and survive under extreme combat stress.
Soviet Russian Combatives: From Chaos to Codification 🟥🪖🥋
Click on the links below to read more.
⚔️ From the Ashes of Defeat
The seeds of Russia’s martial revival were sown in the bitter lessons of Port Arthur and the bruising encounters with Japanese forces in the early 20th century. Defeat had exposed the inadequacies of Tsarist close-combat training, where poorly prepared conscripts faced well-drilled adversaries skilled in bayonet tactics and battlefield jujutsu. Determined not to repeat these failings, Soviet military thinkers accelerated their search for a practical, homegrown fighting system. Drawing from the rugged heritage of Cossack sabre fighting and indigenous wrestling styles, while openly studying foreign arts like Judo, Soviet pioneers began to shape a new doctrine. What had begun as scattered experimentation now matured into a systematic approach—one that would soon coalesce into Sambo, the Soviet Union’s answer to modern hand-to-hand combat.
🔧 The Soviet Search for a Native Combat System
In the aftermath of revolution and civil war, the Soviet Union sought to forge a martial system that reflected its military priorities and ideological independence. Enter Sambo (Samozashchita Bez Oruzhiya, meaning “self-defence without weapons”)—a hybrid martial art designed for military efficiency and internal security. Pioneers Viktor Spiridonov and Vasili Oshchepkov combined Japanese Jujutsu and Judo with indigenous wrestling styles such as Georgian Chidaoba, Tatar Koresh, Mongolian Bökh, and elements of Catch Wrestling. Spiridonov, himself a disabled war veteran, focused on techniques requiring minimal strength, favouring joint manipulation and leverage over brute force.
Politics soon left its mark. Oshchepkov, despite his pioneering role, fell victim to Stalin’s purges—accused of espionage due to his Japanese connections. His arrest and execution effectively erased official recognition of Judo’s contribution to Sambo, allowing Soviet authorities to claim it as an entirely native creation that aligned with their ideological narrative.
🧱Kharlampiev and the Formalisation of Sambo
Building on their foundations, Anatoly Kharlampiev played a crucial role in codifying Sambo and is often credited as its official founder. By the 1930s, Sambo was recognised by Soviet sporting authorities and became a mandatory component of Red Army training. Two distinct branches emerged: Sport Sambo, focusing on throws and pins for competition, and Combat Sambo, designed for battlefield application with integrated strikes, submissions, and protective gear for realism in training.
Crucially, Sambo was not confined to elite units. Its core principles were drilled into regular Red Army infantry, ensuring that even frontline conscripts were equipped with aggressive, practical methods for bayonet fighting, grappling, and close-quarters survival.
More than just a fighting system, Sambo was promoted as a Soviet alternative to Japanese martial arts, reinforcing national identity and military doctrine. Soviet instructors studied foreign systems but adapted them ruthlessly to suit Soviet needs, ensuring Sambo prioritised aggressive takedowns, leg locks, and decisive control tactics.
Early border conflicts with Japan, such as the Battle of Khalkhin Gol in 1939, gave Soviet forces an invaluable opportunity to apply their close-combat methods under battlefield conditions. These clashes served as a proving ground, testing and refining Sambo’s effectiveness, and preparing Soviet troops for the brutal engagements that lay ahead in World War II.
⚠️ Proving Ground: The Soviet-Japanese Border
Early border conflicts with Japan, such as the Battle of Khalkhin Gol in 1939, gave Soviet forces an invaluable opportunity to apply their close-combat methods under battlefield conditions. These clashes served as a proving ground, testing and refining Sambo’s effectiveness, and preparing Soviet troops for the brutal engagements that lay ahead in World War II.
🧨 Red Fury — Combat Sambo in World War II
When the Soviet Union entered World War II, Sambo’s battlefield adaptations became essential for survival in brutal close-quarters combat. Soviet Spetsnaz units refined Combat Sambo’s ground-fighting techniques for military raids and special operations, focusing on throws, joint locks, and rapid submissions to incapacitate enemies efficiently. The legacy of Vasili Oshchepkov remained evident, with a strong emphasis on Judo-inspired tactics combined with Russian wrestling instincts to dominate both offensively and defensively.
Bayonet and knife fighting were seamlessly integrated with Sambo principles, ensuring Red Army soldiers and Spetsnaz operatives could adapt swiftly to urban warfare and confined spaces. Soviet close-combat training prioritised disarming techniques, surprise attacks, and brutal takedowns to overwhelm enemies at close quarters.
🕵️♂️ KGB, NKVD, and the Dark Arts of Control
Beyond the battlefield, KGB operatives utilised Combat Sambo for interrogation, security operations, and assassinations. Training emphasised fast incapacitation methods such as shoulder throws, leg locks, and neck cranks, while NKVD instructors further refined psychological warfare and compliance tactics to break resistance quickly. Combat Sambo’s versatility extended to controlling prisoners, neutralising guards, and dispatching threats silently during covert missions.
🩸 Combat Sambo’s Post-War Legacy
By the end of the war, Combat Sambo had firmly established itself as the backbone of Soviet military combatives, its influence spreading throughout the Eastern Bloc and shaping post-war doctrines for decades to come. Militaries in East Germany, Bulgaria, Romania, and other Soviet-aligned nations integrated Sambo-inspired methods into their own military and police combatives, ensuring the Soviet approach to close-quarters combat resonated far beyond Russia’s borders.

Sambo was developed as a hybrid martial art for the Red Army, blending judo, wrestling, and native folk grappling styles. Early training focused on fast takedowns, joint locks, and practical self-defence, aiming to create soldiers who could dominate in close-quarters combat against any opponent.
Germany — Close-Combat Training in the Third Reich 🇩🇪🗡️🥋
Click on the links below to read more.
⚔️🥊 Hand-to-Hand Combat Training in the Wehrmacht
Within the Third Reich’s military strategy, hand-to-hand combat was viewed as a critical skill for infantry and special units alike. The Wehrmacht incorporated techniques from Catch Wrestling, Judo, and Japanese Jiu-Jitsu, focusing on throws, joint locks, and submission holds to swiftly incapacitate enemies in close-quarters battle. Kodokan Judo’s influence filtered into German training via European exchanges, with effective moves such as hip throws, leg sweeps, and standing armlocks adopted for battlefield practicality.
This development aligned with Heinrich Himmler’s emphasis on martial prowess, as he sought to instil an image of elite combat readiness across SS formations. Training manuals outlined controlled aggression and explosive techniques, reinforcing Germany’s broader Blitzkrieg doctrine of overwhelming force, even in micro combat scenarios.
🧠 The Role of the SS and Political Indoctrination
For the SS, combat training was intertwined with ideology. Hand-to-hand combat became a political and psychological tool, reinforcing the notion of racial superiority and elite warrior status. SS recruits were drilled relentlessly in Judo-derived takedowns, knife fighting, and pain compliance techniques, ensuring they could neutralise opponents with ruthless efficiency.
This martial focus went beyond mere physical preparation—it was part of a psychological conditioning programme that cultivated aggression, obedience, and an unyielding mindset, especially for units engaged in counter-insurgency, urban warfare, and rear-line security operations.
🪂🤼 Fallschirmjäger: Germany’s Elite Paratroopers
The Fallschirmjäger (paratroopers) received specialised close-combat training, preparing them for operations behind enemy lines where firearms might be impractical. Their regimen combined Judo throws, Catch Wrestling holds, and knife combat, with a heavy emphasis on trench knife techniques for rapid neutralisation in confined spaces.
German wrestling traditions like Ringen also shaped their methodology, contributing grappling skills, throws, and ground control tactics essential for ambush scenarios and close-quarters domination. These elite airborne units became renowned for their ability to seize fortified positions, often employing stealth, speed, and aggressive close-quarters assaults to overcome defenders.
🔫🪓 Bayonet Integration and Close-Quarters Battlefield Application
German combat doctrine emphasised integrating bayonet fighting with grappling techniques to maintain momentum during assaults. Soldiers were trained to transition fluidly between firearms, bayonet thrusts, and unarmed combat, ensuring adaptability in urban warfare, trench fighting, and close-quarters environments.
The emphasis on improvised weapons, including entrenching tools and field knives, gave German troops flexibility in brutal melee encounters, especially during the intense street fighting of the Eastern Front.
Krav Maga: Born from Street Combat 🏙️🥾👊🏻
Click on the links below to read more.
🚷🥊 Survival in the Streets of Bratislava
In the mid-1930s, as anti-Semitic violence surged across Bratislava, the Jewish community faced relentless street attacks from Nazi gangs and hostile authorities. Imi Lichtenfeld, a skilled boxer and wrestler, emerged as a leader of the local defence groups, rallying Jewish fighters to protect their neighbourhoods. However, Imi quickly realised that competition sport techniques fell short in the brutal chaos of real-world ambushes. Boxing and wrestling formed his base, but these were rapidly adapted for dirty, practical street combat, where the objective was not points but survival.
Imi’s evolving method focused on preemptive strikes, weapon disarms (especially knives), and rapid escape tactics. He drilled fighters to target vital points like the groin, throat, and eyes, exploiting weaknesses to end fights quickly. Training was harsh and unrefined, shaped by the grim reality of street battles: no uniforms, no rules, no mercy. Combatants learned to expect multiple attackers, improvised weapons, and hostile environments. This crucible forged the raw, instinctive DNA of what would later become Krav Maga.
✡️⚔️ From Resistance to Exodus
As violence escalated and Imi’s self-defence groups became targets for both Nazi sympathisers and anti-Semitic authorities, he became a marked man. In 1940, he fled Bratislava aboard one of the last refugee ships to escape occupied Europe. His journey to British Mandatory Palestine marked a turning point. While the streets of Bratislava had been his testing ground, the volatile landscapes of Palestine would soon transform his experience into something more organised — a system for training soldiers, not just survivors.
🪖🏋️ Training the Fighters of the Haganah
By 1944, Lichtenfeld was instructing elite units of the Haganah, including the Palmach strike force and the Palyam naval commandos. Building on the guerrilla combatives already developing in underground forces like the Haganah and early Kapap instructors, Imi refined and systemised street-tested survival tactics into a streamlined method for soldiers. He taught physical conditioning, wrestling, knife combat, and defences against armed attackers — lessons blood-forged in Bratislava’s alleys and adapted to the new realities of guerrilla warfare.
These early training programmes still carried the raw edge of street survival: techniques prioritised neutralising threats instantly, countering ambushes, and maintaining combat readiness in unpredictable environments. Although not yet a formal military curriculum, these methods, alongside existing resistance training traditions, laid the tactical groundwork for Israel’s future defence forces. Krav Maga remained at this point a system of necessity — awaiting its evolution into a structured, official military combative art in the post-war era.

Early Krav Maga training in Israel reflected a raw fusion of influences—street-tested survival tactics from Imi Lichtenfeld blended with Kapap’s guerrilla combat methods. Together, they forged a practical, instinct-driven fighting system that would become the backbone of Israeli hand-to-hand combat.
Martial Arts in the Shadows 🥋🌒
Martial Arts Beyond the Battlefield
While global warfare dominated headlines, martial arts survived in the shadows—kept alive by resistance fighters, underground schools, and exiled masters. From Brazil to China, Korea to Southeast Asia, these arts adapted to street fights, guerrilla raids, and cultural suppression. Quietly evolving under pressure, they emerged from war refined and resilient, ready to shape the post-war martial renaissance.
Introduction
While the major conflicts of the early 20th century shaped the battlefield, martial arts continued to evolve elsewhere in the world—through resistance movements, covert training, and cultural preservation. From the development of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu in South America to the survival of Chinese, Southeast Asian, Indian, and Korean martial traditions under occupation, these arts adapted to challenges far removed from traditional war theatres. This section explores how localised conflicts, guerrilla tactics, and underground training ensured the survival and evolution of these martial systems, highlighting their resilience and effectiveness in both self-defence and insurgent warfare.
Click on the links below to read more.
🇧🇷🥋 Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu – The Quiet Evolution (1914–1945)
Mitsuyo Maeda, a Judo master with experience in catch-as-catch-can wrestling, introduced Jiu-Jitsu to Brazil in 1914, teaching Carlos Gracie and later his younger brother, Hélio Gracie. Faced with physical limitations, Hélio refined the system by focusing on leverage-based ground fighting and precise submissions to defeat larger, stronger opponents. Throughout the 1930s and 40s, the Gracie family launched public challenge matches against boxers, wrestlers, and street fighters, proving BJJ’s effectiveness in unscripted combat without weight divisions or restrictive rulesets.
The influence of Catch wrestling was clear in BJJ’s arsenal of neck cranks, leg locks, and positional control, enhancing its adaptability for real-world encounters. Meanwhile, brutal Vale Tudo (“Anything Goes”) matches tested the system against a wide spectrum of fighting styles, reinforcing BJJ’s focus on ground dominance and submission mastery over striking exchanges. Brazilian police forces also began adopting BJJ for close-quarters arrest tactics, recognising its efficiency in controlling aggressive suspects with minimal reliance on weapons.
By the close of WWII, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu had carved a reputation as a practical, pressure-tested martial art—shaped in street fights, ring challenges, and law enforcement confrontations. Its foundations during this era quietly prepared it for the global surge that would follow in the decades to come.
🇧🇷🦶 Capoeira - Adaptation and Evolution
During the build-up to and throughout World War II, as Brazil aligned with the Allies, the government worked to shift Capoeira’s public perception from outlawed street fighting to a legitimate martial art. Efforts to promote national identity and physical readiness raised Capoeira’s profile, sharpening its utility for both self-defence and law enforcement applications.
In Brazil’s urban centres, Mestre Bimba spearheaded a transformative evolution with his development of Capoeira Regional. Moving away from purely ritualised movements, Bimba focused on practical, street-ready techniques, integrating elements of boxing, Batuque grappling, and effective counter-attacks. This refinement enriched Capoeira’s arsenal, sharpening devastating kicks, headbutts, and sweeps for real-world application in street fights and confrontations with law enforcement.
The 1930s and 40s saw Capoeira shed its outlaw stigma, gaining recognition as both a cultural heritage and a practical combat system. Public demonstrations, growing acceptance in athletic circles, and official recognition as part of Brazil’s cultural identity helped anchor its place in Brazilian society. By the end of the war, Capoeira had evolved into a versatile and adaptive martial art, blending tradition with modern combat pragmatism—ready to influence not just Brazil’s identity, but future global martial trends.
🇨🇳🗡️ Chinese Martial Arts – Survival and Resistance
During the Japanese invasion of China, Chinese martial arts endured as both a means of cultural preservation and, in some cases, localised resistance. Systems like Wing Chun, Xingyiquan, and Bajiquan continued to be practised by village militias and groups such as the Red Spear Society, where traditional techniques supported self-defence and ambush tactics on a limited scale. While formal military units like the Eighth Route Army prioritised firearms and guerrilla warfare, local fighters drew from inherited martial knowledge to defend their communities when forced into close quarters.
Although no formal system of Sanda existed at the time, fighters relied on the free-fighting traditions of the Republican era, particularly Lei Tai platform combat, blending strikes and grappling in rough, unsanctioned encounters. These proto-Sanda methods, born of necessity, saw Xingyiquan’s direct, linear attacks and Bajiquan’s explosive, short-range power applied in close-range ambushes and skirmishes.
Despite occupation bans and wartime hardship, Triad societies and underground martial arts schools safeguarded traditional teachings, ensuring continuity in secret safe houses and secluded training grounds. Weapons practice — particularly with staffs, spears, and improvised tools — remained essential for rural militias, while the symbolic use of concealed weapons like hook swords allowed for cultural defiance even under watchful occupation forces.
Meanwhile, Yip Man, though forced into obscurity, quietly refined Wing Chun, focusing on speed, economy of motion, and brutal close-range effectiveness. His dedication ensured that the art survived the war years, poised for revival in the turbulent era to come.
🌏🔪 Southeast Asia – Martial Arts Under Occupation
During the Japanese occupation of the Philippines, guerrilla fighters relied on traditional bladed weapons and close-quarters combat tactics, drawing from the rich heritage of Kali (Eskrima/Arnis). Bolos, machetes, and knives proved essential for jungle ambushes and sabotage missions, enabling resistance groups like the Hukbalahap to launch effective attacks despite limited firearms. Beyond the battlefield, Kali became a vital means of cultural preservation, ensuring its techniques and traditions survived even under strict restrictions. Fighters adapted their training with farm tools and improvised weapons, keeping their combat skills sharp even when steel was scarce.
In Indonesia, Silat endured quietly as a cultural tradition, maintained through secret training and community gatherings. While resistance forces depended mostly on guerrilla tactics and smuggled firearms, Silat remained a symbol of resilience and national pride, laying the foundation for its revival in the post-war years.
In Burma, martial arts like Lethwei survived in rural villages, where local matches continued beyond the watchful eyes of colonial powers and occupying forces. Often staged as part of village festivals, these brutal striking contests preserved Lethwei’s techniques and spirit, keeping the art alive despite wartime hardships. Even without direct involvement in resistance efforts, Lethwei remained intact—ready for resurgence after the war.
In Vietnam, under French colonial rule and later Japanese occupation, martial arts such as Vo Thuat persisted quietly in rural enclaves and nationalist circles. While formal resistance groups like the Viet Minh focused on guerrilla warfare and firearms, these traditional systems endured as cultural symbols, awaiting their moment to re-emerge during Vietnam’s struggle for independence.
Though martial arts across Southeast Asia were not universally applied in guerrilla combat, their survival through occupation played a crucial role in safeguarding cultural identity. In the Philippines, traditional systems directly supported the resistance, while in other regions, they endured as symbols of resilience, poised for rebirth. These arts—once hidden in secrecy—would later surge into post-war revival movements, shaping national pride and informing military training in the newly independent nations of Southeast Asia.
🇮🇳🛕 India’s Martial Arts – Resistance and Military Training
During the early 20th century, Indian martial arts like Kalaripayattu, Gatka, and Pehlwani endured beneath colonial restrictions. After the 1857 Rebellion, British crackdowns forced many traditions underground, surviving through temple rituals, rural festivals, and discreet training in akharas and gurdwaras.
Though absent from World War II battlefields, these arts remained vital symbols of cultural resilience. Pehlwani thrived in akhara pits, preserving physical culture across generations. Gatka survived in Sikh festivals and ceremonies, keeping weapon skills alive. Kalaripayattu continued in southern India, safeguarded by family lineages dedicated to preserving its techniques and spiritual heritage.
Despite wartime pressures, the quiet perseverance of these traditions laid the groundwork for a powerful post-independence revival—restoring India’s martial arts as emblems of national pride and resilience.
🇰🇷👣 Korea’s Martial Arts – Surviving Occupation
Under Japanese occupation (1910–1945), Korean martial arts faced severe suppression, with traditional systems banned from public practice and forced underground. Arts like Taekkyeon survived quietly in rural villages and hidden gatherings, preserving deceptive footwork, fluid kicks, and open-hand strikes that had been passed down for generations. Similarly, Ssireum (traditional Korean wrestling) remained embedded in cultural festivals and rural communities, safeguarding Korea’s indigenous grappling traditions despite colonial efforts to erase native combat systems.
However, the widespread introduction of Japanese martial arts during this time—particularly Karate, Judo, and Kendo—had a profound, if unintended, influence. These arts were integrated into schools, police academies, and military training under the colonial regime. While aimed at controlling the Korean population, this exposure familiarised a new generation of Koreans with structured martial training and combat methods, inadvertently laying the groundwork for post-war hybrid systems.
Amid these pressures, a network of underground dojangs (training halls) and dedicated practitioners kept Korean martial heritage alive, nurturing both the physical techniques and the cultural spirit tied to them. Training was often secretive, passed between trusted students and masters determined to preserve national identity through martial practice. Though open combat was rare during the occupation years, the quiet perseverance of these arts ensured that, when Korea regained its independence, a foundation for revival remained intact—one that would soon evolve into modern systems like Taekwondo, blending traditional Korean techniques with the martial experiences gained during decades of occupation.

During WWII, traditional Korean martial arts like Taekkyon were suppressed under Japanese rule, while Japanese styles such as Karate were promoted. After the war, Korean masters like General Choi Hong Hi (above central) merged native kicking techniques with Japanese hand strikes, giving rise to Taekwondo—”The Way of the Foot and Fist.”
Though hidden from the frontlines, these martial arts forged their survival in the shadows, quietly adapting through hardship and resistance—emerging from the war poised not only for revival, but for global influence in the decades to come.
Legacy of World War Era Combat
What Endures ⚔️ 🤼 👊🏼
As warfare descended into the mud, trenches, and ruins of the 20th century, hand-to-hand combat was forced into brutal evolution. Traditional martial arts were stripped to their raw essentials, forging battlefield systems that prioritised speed, simplicity, and survival. Across the globe, combat arts adapted to meet the grim demands of modern warfare—creating lethal hybrids that would shape the future of military and martial training alike.
📌 The Shift to Combatives: Why WW Combat Changed
World War I revealed the brutal reality of industrialised slaughter. Trenches carved across Europe created a confined, suffocating battlefield where traditional martial arts techniques proved impractical. Soldiers needed systems that were fast to learn, brutally efficient, and instinctive under extreme stress. Elaborate styles and prolonged techniques were abandoned in favour of immediate survival tactics.
Mud, close quarters, and limited visibility made sophisticated footwork and high kicks unrealistic. Bootcamp time was short. Soldiers had to learn and internalise simple, lethal movements quickly, knowing they might face combat within weeks of enlistment. Martial arts like Judo were stripped to essential holds and chokes, while natural body mechanics were favoured over ornate styles. The focus was not points or honourable victory, but raw survival: to kill or disable the opponent before being killed.
This battlefield demand forced a new era of combat thinking—practical, brutal, and instinct-driven, setting the psychological and technical tone for the development of modern combatives.
→ Yet hand-to-hand survival alone wasn’t enough. Grappling needed refinement to suit brutal, fast-paced warfare—enter Combat Judo.
📌 Gutter Fighting: The Tactical Response
Out of these harsh realities emerged the era of “gutter fighting”—dirty, ruthless systems that blended boxing, judo, dirty tactics, and close-quarters efficiency. Elite units like the British Commandos, Soviet Spetsnaz, and OSS operatives specialised in these brutal methods, relying on speed, aggression, and surprise to dominate hostile environments.
Training emphasised disabling the enemy immediately: eye gouges, throat strikes, joint breaks, and rapid throws. The influence of Defendu, created by William Fairbairn and Eric Sykes, merged boxing, jiu-jitsu, and no-rules street-fighting into a streamlined system for military use. Emphasising instinctive reactions over complex drills, gutter fighting gave soldiers a reliable set of tools for chaotic, lethal encounters.
This approach continues to inform military special forces today, proving that the principles of gutter fighting—simplicity, brutality, and adaptability—remain timeless in combat effectiveness.
→ Yet even with lethal technique, success often depended on the weapons in a soldier’s hands, leading to rapid innovation in close-combat tools.
📌 Combat Judo: The Grappling Backbone of World War II Combatives
World War II’s savage close-quarters fighting pushed Judo beyond the dojo into the harsh realities of the battlefield. Stripped of ceremony, its throws, chokes, and joint locks were sharpened for lethal efficiency, with techniques like hip throws and armbars adapted for fast, decisive action under fire.
Combat Judo wasn’t limited to unarmed encounters. Soldiers learned to blend bayonet deflections, knife counters, and grip control with Judo’s body mechanics, enabling them to fluidly transition between weapons and bare hands. In the claustrophobic spaces of trenches and bunkers, these hybrid tactics proved essential for survival.
Its influence spread rapidly. Soviet forces incorporated Judo into Combat Sambo, while British and American troops folded its principles into their own combatives. Manuals like Kill or Get Killed by Rex Applegate ensured these battlefield lessons were preserved and taught to soldiers and police worldwide.
By war’s end, Combat Judo had established itself not as sport, but as a ruthless survival tool. Its instinctive movements and mechanical precision left a lasting legacy, becoming a cornerstone of military combatives worldwide and securing its place as one of the most influential fighting systems of the 20th century.
📌 Weapon Adaptation & Innovation
The grim conditions of both World Wars demanded weapons suited for close-quarters combat. Soldiers turned to bayonets, trench knives, knuckle dusters, entrenching tools, and even handmade trench clubs to survive brutal encounters.
Bayonet fencing techniques from the Victorian era were adapted for muddy trench warfare, focusing on thrusts and slashes usable in confined spaces. Manuals detailed practical grips, footwork, and angles of attack. Trench raiders trained specifically in stabbing, slashing, and bludgeoning techniques for night assaults and tight environments.
Weapons like the Sykes-Fairbairn fighting knife became icons of silent lethality, designed for quick, efficient kills. Improvised tools were equally critical—entrenching tools sharpened into axes, weighted trench clubs for crushing blows, and compact weapons for stealth eliminations.
The brutal efficiency of these weapons informed future military design, embedding close-quarters solutions into modern military doctrine.
→ As weapons evolved, so too did the way fighting systems were taught and transmitted across armies worldwide.
📌 Codification & Cross-Training
One of the most significant advancements of this era was the formalisation of combat knowledge into manuals and structured training systems. Kill or Get Killed, the US military’s close-combat bible authored by Rex Applegate, captured the brutal lessons of trench and urban warfare for both soldiers and post-war law enforcement.
Cross-training exploded during this period. Japanese Judo and Karate found their way into Allied military curriculums, while Soviet Sambo integrated wrestling, judo, and native fighting methods into an adaptable combat system. Manuals from British, American, and Soviet forces distilled battlefield experience into teachable drills, creating resilient training programmes.
This codification ensured battlefield lessons were not lost to time. Systems became exportable, adaptable, and resilient—laying the philosophical groundwork for post-war martial arts, military combatives, and even the cross-training mindset of modern MMA.
→ Combat knowledge wasn’t confined to allies alone. Across battlefields and occupied lands, fighters learned from friend and foe alike.
📌 Cross-Pollination Between Enemies and Occupiers
Wartime collisions of cultures led to unexpected exchanges of combat knowledge. In Korea, exposure to Japanese martial arts during occupation would plant the seeds for Taekwondo and Hapkido. In China, resistance fighters adapted proto-Sanda techniques, blending native skills with imported Japanese and Western methods.
Brazilian catch wrestling, already a vibrant system, absorbed global influences and later gave rise to Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ), a synthesis of Japanese groundwork and local adaptation. Across occupied territories and battlefronts, fighters studied their adversaries’ techniques, adopted what worked, and created hybrid systems tailored for survival.
This organic cross-pollination enriched martial arts worldwide, transforming isolated systems into globally informed disciplines.
→ Beyond physical technique, true survival demanded hardened minds. Combat training now forged not just bodies, but indomitable mental resilience.
📌 Mental Conditioning & Combat Readiness
Combat in this era demanded more than physical skill—it required extreme mental resilience. Training methods across armies focused on creating soldiers who could operate under relentless pressure. Japan’s emphasis on Bushidō, Soviet mental toughness through Sambo, and brutal German physical conditioning drilled recruits to endure chaos and respond instinctively in close combat.
These principles forged the mental blueprint for modern military combatives and elite forces, where stress inoculation and aggression control remain central to survival.
→ But while major powers formalised training, martial arts in occupied territories fought for survival in the shadows.
📌 Combat Systems Under Occupation
While global powers militarised martial arts, occupied regions like Korea, India, and Southeast Asia preserved striking, grappling, and weapons techniques through underground training. Traditional martial arts continued to be practiced in secret schools, temples, and community spaces.
- Korea: Dojangs operated covertly under Japanese occupation, preserving Taekkyon and other native arts.
- India: Akharas and Sikh gurdwaras maintained wrestling and Gatka traditions away from colonial oversight.
- China: Triads and secret societies protected Chinese martial arts, keeping them alive amid foreign invasions.
- Southeast Asia: Kali, Silat, and Lethwei masters taught in hidden settings, ensuring survival through guerrilla resistance.
These hidden practices not only kept cultural identity alive but ensured that effective combat knowledge survived the war years, later resurfacing to influence post-war military and civilian martial systems worldwide. Their resilience embodies the enduring spirit of martial arts as both combat systems and cultural treasures.
→ Even as martial arts lived underground, their influence continued to grow. Back home, combat became global entertainment.
📌 The Birth of Combat Sports: Combat Becomes Global Entertainment
While the world fought for survival, combat sports found mass audiences. Boxing and professional wrestling surged, amplified by the rise of radio and television. Listeners worldwide followed blow-by-blow accounts, while televised matches brought the thrill of combat into homes.
This explosion of accessibility built global fanbases, inspiring generations of fighters and fans. Combat sports emerged not only as entertainment but as powerful symbols of discipline, resilience, and skill. As soldiers returned home, many found new purpose in boxing gyms and wrestling rings, transitioning battlefield experience into sporting achievement.
The era cemented combat sports as mainstream pursuits—cultural phenomena that honoured the warrior spirit while thrilling audiences worldwide. These wartime evolutions laid the groundwork for the post-war boom in both competitive martial arts and modern military combatives, where the lessons of the battlefield continued to shape fighters, soldiers, and self-defence systems worldwide.
From the trenches of Europe to the underground dojangs of Korea, the global crucible of war reshaped hand-to-hand combat irreversibly. Techniques once passed quietly between masters and students exploded into battlefield necessity. As peace slowly returned, these wartime lessons carried forward into martial arts schools, military academies, and combat sports arenas worldwide—ensuring that the savage wisdom of the 20th century would never be forgotten.
🧭 Summary
The World War era reshaped martial arts into systems that transcended battlefield necessity, forging paths into military doctrine, resistance movements, and popular sport. Trench warfare in WWI sharpened bayonet and knife fighting, while WWII special forces training accelerated the rise of Fairbairn-Sykes combatives, OSS dirty tactics, and Soviet Combat Sambo. Simultaneously, Krav Maga emerged from brutal street survival in occupied Europe, while Judo cemented its role in military training across both Axis and Allied forces. Covert operations and espionage further expanded the martial repertoire, teaching resistance fighters and operatives to survive behind enemy lines.

Beyond the battlefield, combat sports thrived. Boxing and wrestling captured global audiences, nurturing a culture of toughness and national pride. Japanese martial arts, including Judo and Karate, spread internationally through diplomacy and post-war occupation, while nations like Germany, the Soviet Union, and the United States cultivated physical culture to instil martial spirit and readiness in their populations. At the same time, in occupied territories and colonised regions, traditional arts like Chinese kung fu, Southeast Asian systems, and Indian and Korean martial traditions endured in secret, preserving cultural identity under foreign rule.
By the end of WWII, martial arts had transformed from isolated regional traditions into globally recognised systems, uniting military efficiency with cultural pride and sporting spectacle. This period not only refined combat for the realities of modern warfare but also laid the foundations for the post-war martial arts explosion—where sport, self-defence, and military combatives would evolve side by side on a truly global stage.
Our next post explores the Post-WWII to Late 20th Century era. Returning GIs helped spread Karate, Bruce Lee revolutionized kung fu cinema, and Vale Tudo laid the groundwork for global shifts in combat sports.
Timeline 🕰️📅📈
Date | Development/Technique/Event | Region | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
1914–1918 CE | Trench Warfare: Adaptations of bayonet, knife fighting, and hand-to-hand combat for trench assaults. | Europe | Highlighted need for close-quarters combat techniques. |
1920–1925 CE | BJJ Origins: Mitsuyo Maeda introduces judo to Brazil; Carlos Gracie opens first BJJ school. | Brazil | Laid the foundation for Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. |
1920s–1930s CE | Sambo Development: Viktor Spiridonov and Vasili Oshchepkov combine judo and native wrestling. | Soviet Union | Established Sambo as a national sport and military system. |
1930s CE | Krav Maga Origins: Imi Lichtenfeld begins developing Krav Maga in Czechoslovakia. | Czechoslovakia | Focused on practical, real-world self-defence. |
1932 CE | Mestre Bimba’s Capoeira School: Establishes Luta Regional Baiana. | Brazil | Formalised capoeira as a recognised martial art. |
1935 CE | Karate Officialised: Okinawan arts officially called “karate,” blending te and kara. | Okinawa (Japan) | Unified Okinawan martial arts under a single name. |
1942 CE | Aikido Named: Morihei Ueshiba establishes Aikido, evolving from aiki-jujutsu. | Japan | Focused on redirection and non-lethal techniques. |
1943 CE | Martial Arts in Korea: Judo, karate, and Chinese systems mix with local arts. | Korea | Beginnings of modern Korean martial arts like Taekwondo and Hapkido. |
1945 CE | First Korean Dojang: Martial arts schools open in Seoul post-WWII. | Korea | Formalised Korean martial arts training infrastructure. |
c. 1914–1945 CE | Pro Wrestling Emergence: Development of “worked” matches combining showmanship and grappling. | USA, Japan, UK | Laid groundwork for modern professional wrestling. |
c. 1914–1945 CE | Western Boxing and Wrestling: Increased professionalisation and popularity. | Global | Shaped global interest in combat sports. |
c. 1920s–1930s CE | Fairbairn-Sykes Combatives: Developed for Shanghai Municipal Police and British Commandos. | China, UK | Influenced military close-combat training globally. |
c. 1920s–1930s CE | National Identity and Martial Arts: Emphasis on jujutsu/judo in Japan and Sambo in Soviet Union. | Japan, Soviet Union | Martial arts became symbols of national pride and identity. |